Top Ten Most Popular Posts for 2018

10. Objective Morality, the Nature of Guilt, and God’s Offer of Divine Forgiveness and Promise of Moral Transformation

Stephen Jordan (May 2018)

9. Reading Literature through the Eyes of C.S. Lewis

Lauren Platanos (June 2018)

8. Seven Reasons Why Moral Apologetics Points to Christianity

David Baggett (March 2017)

7. Train Your Wizards in the Way They Should Go

Marybeth Baggett (October 2018)

6. Podcast: David Baggett on the Euthyphro Dilemma

David Baggett (November 2014)

5. The Third Option to the Euthyphro Dilemma

Frederick Choo (May 2016)

4. Matt Dillahunty, David Baggett Discuss an Abductive Moral Argument

(March 2018)

3. The Goodness of God after the Loss of My Son

Jeffrey Dickson (October 2018)

2. Ravi Zacharias’ Foreword to the Morals of the Story

(May 2018)

1. The Faithful Witness of Fred Rogers

Marybeth Baggett (July 2018)

Top 10 Posts for 2017

Photo by Jez Timms on Unsplash

Photo by Jez Timms on Unsplash

Thank you for supporting Moral Apologetics in 2017! We have had an exciting year and it has been a privilege to host some exciting content in 2017. As a way of looking back, we wanted to share with you the list of the most read posts for the year.

1. "On Psychopathy and Moral Apologetics"  By David Baggett

2.  "Seven Reasons Why Moral Apologetics Points to Christianity"  By David Baggett

3.  "God’s Goodness and Difficult Old Testament Passages"  By Michael Austin

4.  "The Most Reluctant Convert: C. S. Lewis Onstage"  By David Baggett

5.  "The Failure of Naturalism as a Foundation for Human Rights" By Angus J. L. Menuge

6.  Good God Panel Discussion with Baggett, Walls, Copan, and Craig

7.  "What to Make of a Diminished Thing: Poeticizing the Fall"   By Corey Latta

8. "Advent and Christmas Poetry: Awe – John Donne’s 'Holy Sonnet 15'" By Holly Ordway

9.  "Hosea and Polyamory: The Sufficiency of Scripture" By Joshua Herring

10. "Living Life All the Way Up”: Hemingway’s Moral Apologetic from Absence" By Corey Latta

 

Image: "Happy New Year" by A. Verde. CC Licence. 

New Associate Editor: T. J. Gentry

MoralApologetics.com is excited to announce a New Associate Editor: T. J. Gentry. He’ll be joining our team with the particular intent of focusing on pastoral issues related to moral apologetics. He shares a passion for the moral argument(s) and brings much to his new post. He is, in his own words, a “mere Christian with genuine fascination and awe for the breadth and depth of God’s gracious kingdom.”

He became a Christian in 1978, and began pastoral ministry in 1984. He has worked as a youth pastor, senior pastor, church planter, church-based seminary professor, and as a chaplain assistant in the Army Chaplain Corps. A southern Illinois native, T. J. is a graduate of Southern Illinois University-Carbondale with a BA in Political Science; Liberty University with an MAR in Church Ministries, an MDiv in Chaplaincy, and a ThM in Theology; and Piedmont International University with a DMin in Pastoral Counseling. T. J. is currently pursuing a PhD in Theology and Apologetics at Liberty, hoping to write his dissertation on some aspect of the intersection of moral apologetics and the pastorate.

He is the author of God Help Us: Encouragement for Evangelism, and Thinking of Worship: A Liturgical Miscellany, as well as the forthcoming Evangel-ogetics: Apologetics for the Sake of the Lost. T. J. has published articles on liturgics, pastoral counseling, and church-based counseling ministries. He lives in Carterville, Illinois with his wife and five children, where he pastors an independent evangelical church, directs a Christian counseling ministry, and serves as a Brigade Chaplain for the Army National Guard. T.J.’s preaching may be heard at www.sermonaudio.com/fellowshipinchrist.

Here’s a recent excerpt from his personal correspondence about moral apologetics:

First, and foundationally, a moral apologetic that is intentionally and consistently anchored in the agape of God, thereby reflecting his heart and character, is the ultimate answer to the burgeoning nihilistic tendencies within our culture. An agape based moral apologetic is able to connect even to the most existentially dour and disconnected person whose illative sense still tells them this type of love and its moral concomitants are real and essential to their wholeness as a person. At their deepest level, unbelievers want an agape based moral apologetic to be true. Moral apologetics are central to evangelism.
Second, insofar as the moral apologetics movement that the Lord is prodding makes an intentional connection to pulpit ministry and counseling, moral apologetics provides a means for pastors to address from the pulpit and in the counseling room the underlying questions they will inevitably face in congregations that are increasingly a mixture of believers and seekers. These believers and seekers need a robust theology that appreciates and draws upon the totality of God's revelation, both natural and special. Moral apologetics rooted in the love of God is, I conclude, the pathway to recover a place at the table for natural theology within Evangelical Christianity, and a way to strengthen the particulars of special revelation regarding the character of God and nature of man. Preaching and counseling will only be enhanced by moral apologetics. In this regard, moral apologetics becomes part of the fabric of congregation-level, workaday Christianity.
I'm praying for clarity regarding my role, as I initially think it is to take the apologetic armament that you are giving me regarding the philosophical and historical foundations and argumentation, and begin to train my sights on how the moral argument relates to various worldviews and apologetics encounters. Something along the lines of the practical and pastoral application of the philosophical, theological, and historical genius of moral apologetics as articulated from an intentional agape based approach.

We’re thrilled to welcome T. J. onboard, and look forward to seeing how God intends to extend the reach of MoralApologetics.com. In addition to the new pastoral focus T. J. will bring (bolstered all the more by the recent addition of Tom Thomas as a regular contributor), here are additional new initiatives the site will be undertaking over the next year:

  • A stronger focus on the history of moral apologetics
  • The relevance of moral apologetics to spiritual formation
  • Forging more explicit connections between moral apologetics and Christian theology in particular
  • Work toward the formation of a Moral Apologetics Center, including grant moneys to facilitate lectureships, conferences, panel discussions, etc.
  • Delineating more exegetical connections to the task of moral apologetics, and
  • Application of moral apologetics in chaplaincy contexts
  • Greater examination of the explanatory power (or lack thereof) of nonChristian religious alternative explanations of features and facets of moral phenomena

As always, submissions on any aspect of moral arguments for God’s existence are welcome and encouraged. Try to keep submissions to about 1000 words normally.

Results from the 2016 MoralApologetics Writing Contest

Results from the 2016 MoralApologetics Writing Contest: It was our great pleasure to read through all the entries to this year’s writing competition. Submissions ranged from a prose poem to a defense of Molinism, from critiques of naturalism to a critical scrutiny of apologetics by a skeptic. Seasoned writers mixed it up with bright newcomers, and our decision was not an easy one. We finally settled on a Grand Prize Winner, a Runner Up, and two Honorable Mentions:

Overall Winner: Jeff Dickson, “Apocalyptic Love and Goodness”

Runner Up: Frederick Choo, “The Third Option to the Euthyphro Dilemma”

Honorable Mentions: Anil Deo & Nolan Whitaker

Thanks to all who participated, and be sure to try again next time around!

Winners of the 2015 MoralApologetics.com Writing Contest

We at MoralApologetics.com are pleased to announce the winners of the 2015 Writing Contest. First, a hearty thanks to all who submitted a paper. We enjoyed reading them all, and it was regrettable there could be only one winner and runner-up in each category. If you entered this year and didn’t win, don’t be discouraged. This will be an annual event, so try again next year, most definitely!

And with that, here are the results:

 

BIBLE:

Winner: Andrew J. Spencer, “Biblical Ethics and the Moral Order in Creation”

Runner-up: Elizabeth Sunshine, “Job, Theodicy, and Ethics”

 

LITERATURE:

Winner: Josh Herring, “The Faustian Bargain of Fifty Shades of Grey

Runner-up: Rachel Boston, “Not Just for Pagans: God’s Redemptive Work through Story”

 

PHILOSOPHY:

Winner: Joshua Fountain, “Grounding Ethics in God: Why God’s Nature Determines Morality”

Runner-up: Dave Sidnam, “A Fundamental Issue with Sam Harris’s The Moral Landscape

 

Some of these essays and others submitted to the writing contest will be appearing on the site, so be on the lookout for those.

Once again, thanks to all the participants. Exciting things are happening in Moral Apologetics!

Photo: "Trophies" by Brad.K, CC License. 

Podcast: Website Introduction

 

Hello!

One of the features we are working for MoralApologetics.com is a weekly podcast. On this very first episode, we hear from Dr. David Baggett on his vision for the website.

Thanks for stopping by,

Jonathan Pruitt